A Washington, DC press photographer vents about the political wranglings in our Nation's Capital.
A senior US Senator says goodbye. Who's next?
Published on November 26, 2007 By joe-pro-photographer In Politics
Good bye, Trent Lott. Today, the number two in the US Senate, announced his retirement. Completing his fourth term in the Senate, and before that, belting 16 years in the House, Lott was a Washington fixture since before my political memory.

Lott is the ultimate politician. Smiling a big toothy grin as he pumps your hand while sporting a sear -sucker suit, he'll say one thing and do another as quick as an oil slick spreads under the Mississippi sun. Of course, Lott ran into trouble a few years ago when he called Senator Strom Thurmond a great American. You remember, I'm sure, Thurmond -- a vocal supporter of segregation -- celebrated his birthday and nearly brought about Lott's political downfall. But the republican version of Teflon Don climbed back to the top of the heap. Lott is as red and as republican as you get.

And, he's retiring. Which leads to the question: are the rats abandoning the ship?

Yesterday, if you asked me the least likely member of the Senate to retire, I would have said Lott. He appears in excellent health, works the lobbyist cocktail parties with zeal, and has shown no sign of wearing down under Washington double speak. No, he thrives in the political environment.

Except the old guard has lost power this past election cycle. Lott just went through one political comeback after the Thurmond fiasco, was another, from under the heels of the democrats, just asking too much? Did he decide to give up the ghost when the former Senate Majority Leader, Bill Frist, a good friend of Lotts, also said goodbye? And what about Frist? Was he bailing before the blue tide moved in? Or, would he have struggled in his reelection, as some suggested, after declaring Terry Schaivo wasn't brain dead upon viewing a video?

Does Lott, always questioning the political wind with a middle finger extended, smell a nasty breeze in the air with the upcoming election?

The pundits say Lott will take his place alongside other former politicians as a Washington Lobbyist. Or, he may be tapped to run the University of Mississippi.

Wherever he goes, I suspect many other Republicans wish they could join him. Depressing times may lay ahead for those who remain.

Comments
on Nov 27, 2007

It happened in 96 when the democrats lost.  Power is a powerful narcotic, and once out of power, yea, these people lose a lot of steam.

But as for your "teflon" comment, I would think you would cast an eye north.  To a senator that has been around a lot longer, and has a much greater history of racism (extending even into the 21st century) and how he is still around, powerful, and the media plays him down like last years fish.

Of course I am referring to the Grand Kleagle himself, who has a "use the N word free card" from the likes of Sharpton and Jackson.

on Nov 27, 2007
Now, of course, it's becomming obvious Lott is leaving before the end of this session so he falls into the old lobbying rules: only waiting one year instead of two.

I dunno, he's pretty Teflon. Maybe it's because I've covered him so much and he always seems to be just a bit of a stereotype. The thought of him pulling a million a year to run an association is pretty obvious.

Hastert, former speaker of the house (and the republicans longest serving speaker of the house), is bailing today. Another rat fleeing the ship? Or, just a bruised ego? I remember during the last state of the union when they had him stuffed way, way in the back. While most people wouldn't think it would matter, I've covered enough politicians to know it's Washington's way of saying "you're yesterday's news."
on Nov 27, 2007

it's Washington's way of saying "you're yesterday's news."

Or maybe you are a loser?  The reason why most leaders of the House and senate resign after their party loses power?  Gilmore did for the RNC, but McAuliffe hung on long past his prime.  But those are symbolic roles, where Speaker and Senate majority leader are probably more heady.

on Nov 28, 2007
I cover tons of cocktail parties where politicians show up, swoop in, gobble up the food and booze, shake hands, and exit out. And, no matter who they are, the average joe (sometimes not so average in this case) in the party gets goggle eyed and this stupid smile on their face that says, "YOU ARE GOD I AM NOT WORTHY". It is sickening. Of course, I make my living by taking the photos of wide-eyed, bewitched people with the politician of the month. However, I can say this: It must be intoxicating to be "the man of the hour" all the time. No wonder power corrupts. Lott's role will now change. He'll make $30,000 a pop "honorariums" for speaking engagements, or run a trade association for a cool million a year. Perhaps he'll write a book or two. But, eventually, he becomes like the Secretary of Agriculture under Ronald Reagan -- And who was the Secretary of Agriculture under Ronald Reagan? Hint: John Block. And he's still around Washington, behind the scenes, collecting money, and affiliated with a trade group. (He is, by the way, a very nice guy. But you see my point).
on Nov 28, 2007
And who was the Secretary of Agriculture under Ronald Reagan? Hint: John Block.


Damn! Got me! I was going to say James Watt (and I only remember him from his Hoof in Mouth problem).

And oh, yea, the SNL skit with Watt, Yassir and Hue.