A Washington, DC press photographer vents about the political wranglings in our Nation's Capital.
Divided, we fail
Published on November 21, 2007 By joe-pro-photographer In Politics
In my last political posting, I suggested Bush was one of the worst Presidents in history. My reasoning was straight forward: no matter what your position on the war in Iraq, his handling of the planning up to war, the execution of the war itself, and the poor after-thought about the conflict's aftermath, make him a nominee for Lousy Prez.

So, many more conservative bloggers took me to task on the intelligence leading up to the war. "No," they write, "hind sight is 20/20, and it's easy to see the intelligence was wrong after the fact."

The problem is,from the beginning, Bush forced the intel to fit his agenda. It's not me who says this, it's a chorus of people from both the right and left. David Kay, former head of the Iraq Survey Group, couldn't believe the lack of intel on WMD's when he started looking for WMD's after the conflict began. And although he had no intel, was given a rag-tag group to look for WMDs, he still thought the wMDs probably existed. As he dug into the reports, he understood how everyone was duped.

The Bush Administration relied on Iraqi exhiles to support the WMD beliefs. Some of these folks hadn't been to Iraq since the first Gulf War. Their intel was more than 10 years old. One was later arrested for accepting money from SH himself, under the oil for food program. He had been a regular visitor at the White House.

A leader doesn't take facts and fit them to his agenda. A leader evaluates facts and reacts to the facts. A leader inspires others to come forward and voice their opinion, even when that opinion is different from theirs. A leader evaluates his team, and watches for power hungry people who can't run their department (read: Rumsfeld), a leader works with the minority and incorporates their concerns, where possible, into his agenda. A leader works within the Constitution. A leader unites and inspires.

Bush did none of these. (Though whether he stepped out of the bounds of the Constitution is open to debate). He took a "you're with us or you're against us" approach.

The uniter turned out to be the ultimate divider.
Comments (Page 15)
15 PagesFirst 13 14 15 
on Nov 28, 2007
Complain about news coverage of elections? I'd just be happy to see some actual coverage of the event, instead of the coverage of the coverage. ;~D
on Nov 28, 2007
Coverage of the coverage is my favorite. My dad is a reporter -- he always said when all else failed, interview a colleague about the story. The only problem is, that's now all we get.

I prefer Oscar. You can see his tighty whiteys.
on Nov 29, 2007

Bush has conviction and I support him 100%... and I don't care who knows I think that.  


I agree 100%
on Nov 29, 2007
Bush has conviction


not yet...but there's always hope!
on Dec 04, 2007
not yet...but there's always hope!


LOL! More likely VEEP for another "hunting accident".

Maybe the next "accident victim" can also apologize for being in the way.
15 PagesFirst 13 14 15