A Washington, DC press photographer vents about the political wranglings in our Nation's Capital.
There are 20 more at least, but I'll leave them for you.
Published on November 17, 2007 By joe-pro-photographer In Politics
As a member of the press, this is an area I have some expertise. However, one disclosure: my days of working for hard news media are few and far between. I've joined the money train. Yup, that's right: most of my work centers on photos taken for groups interracting on Capitol Hill with membes of the government. Is that a fancy way of saying I work for a bunch of lobbyists, and it's my job to make them and our leaders look good for the photos. Yup. And I make a fine good living doing it, so bug off. In fact, let's pause a moment and give thanks to God for lobbyists. All lobbyists. I work for democratic lobbyists, and republican lobbyists. I work for cancer lobbyist, and smoking lobbyist. I work for pro-choice lobbyist and pro-life lobbyist. I even work for other government groups that are putting a good spin on things for the public. I've done official state portraits of some of our "finest " government leaders. And swearing in ceremonies? Hah! You'll look like you are not about to puke on the Bible, I guarantee it. Walk into any Federal Office building across our fine nation and you'll see a portrait of a major government official. I did that! and (a hint) she looks GOOD.

I digress. I don't pretend to work for hard news agencies. I don't even pretend to work for soft news agencies. I work for the spin machine. I love it. I can afford what I want.

But CNN, Fox, NBC, ABC, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Newsweek, Time: who the hell do they work for?

I'd argue they do the same job I do, but that's not their mission.

During the Republican and Democratic Conventions last election, my mom called me and said, "Can you believe CNN has the nerve to have a stage right up front like that? I wonder what political favors they traded for that." I thought she had read one to many blogs. I was wrong.

Access in Washington means soft balling. Get too hard and you are blacklisted. Work for a publication that writes articles not in favor of who your trying to see, you are banned. No access means no news.

I speak from experience. Even in the soft world of news I cover, I sometimes work for a hard news publication. In this case, I was covering the (now X) president of Poland (a communist) meeting with Bush. The publication was an anti-communist daily out of Warsaw. With a gaggle of reporters, I was on my way into the Oval Office for the staged shot in the two chairs. As I headed down the hall..."We're sorry, we're out of room, you have to stay in the press office". The gaggle was smaller than average. There was plenty of room.

So, here's my list of what I hate about major news media:
1. Where the **** are the hard questions?
2. Who gives a damned about OJ or for that matter what Dog the Bounty Hunter said to his son in a private family convesation?
3. Why do reporters give equal weight to both sides of a debate, even when one side is nutty (ie, global warming).
4. Does shouting questions at the curve as people go by ever work?
5. Why do reporters find out good stuff, and then publish it in a book rather than the publications they are working for? Fewer people read their long, long, long books.
6. I don't need my news in a pie chart in pretty colors.
7. I don't want you to interview other reporters and their take on things. That's not news, that's filling the 24/7 cycle.
8. Not everything goes back to illegal immigration.
9. The well rehearsed response in a debate (or to a question) does not equal good debating skills or smarts. (She knew you going to ask the dumb question because you're to stupid to ask something fresh.)
10: a statement to the press is the beginning of a news story, not the news itself.
11. Trying to resond to criticism about not covering enough feel good Iraq stories is stupid. When a situation is crap, report that. Show us.
12. If you can't report outside the green zone because it's too dangerous, maybe that should tell you something.
13. Let families in peace when they are in the middle of the worse moment of their lives. I don't want to see someone interviewed who just lost their best friend. I know how they feel. Get the mic out of their face and **** off.
14. International news is not boring. Tell us what other countries think and are going through, please. The US isn't the center of the universe.
15. When a demonstration forms in a third world country, shouting "Death to Americans", perhaps it is not that spontaneous? Perhaps it is because the cameras are rolling? Perhaps that needs reported? Perhaps the entire demonstration is STAGED!?
16. I don't really care if demonstrators say it was 1 million people and police say it was 900,000 people. I care it was big, medium or small and who organized it and why. I care signs in an Iraqi demonstration are written in English?
17. It's cool to get into see the President. When you do, report that the questions were submitted in advance and that you could only ask what was submitted. I think that's important.
18. Submit questions that don't include, "what is your favorite room in the White House?" If you have 20 minutes to ask questions, he'll spend 18 answering that one.
19. "EEEEEEEOOOOOOOOWWWWWW!!!!" is not news. Forgetting your name during a debate is.
20. Perhaps we could have known Bush was taking his foreign affairs lesson from a Saudi ambassador before the year 2006?

please feel free to ad to the list. I never, ever delete a thing. Be as mean as you want. Oh, and I forgot 21: Kids hanging nooses isn't front page material. It's kids hanging nooses. At the moment, I could use a good noose and a door knob, except I'm too damned tall.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 17, 2007

Why mess with perfection? 

Actually, while I dont agree 100%, i would say at least 90%.

Great list, and you did it with humor. Thanks for the laughs.

on Nov 17, 2007
I agree with every point you made, Joe, save maybe one.

It's refreshing to see that someone "inside" gets it.

Thanks for posting this.
on Nov 17, 2007
What you do for a living is inmaterial; hell I spent thirty years designing and building Naval War Ships (instrustments of death).

Good article, will thought out and just the right amount of satre.

Lee
on Nov 17, 2007

Good article, the touch of pathos was just right.

add one more with:

Why does the agenda driven media just come out and tell the truth about their agenda?

on Nov 17, 2007
Thanks, guys, I'm not used to such positive feedback. Hmmm. And I won $200 bucks at slots today. Geeze. Time for a glass of wine.

Tomorrow, I go to my UU church (where there is not a crucifix to be found) and light a candle. And then, we start another week!
M

PS -- on a personal note. This has been a tough week. Sparring with you guys and writing has helped get me through it. Thanks to you all, even you, Jesus Freak, if you read this. And don't take that the wrong way. I'm still watching my pancakes.
on Nov 17, 2007
Why does the agenda driven media just come out and tell the truth about their agenda?


I don't know. I really don't. I started writing I can answer that, and I got a total blank. I am not a conservative, as you all probably know. I do tend to be down the middle, and part of that is running my own business. One reason I listen to conservative talk radio is you know what slant you are getting. (plus it's good fodder for blogging) One reason I get much of my news from CSPAN is the only thing they say is "this is CSPAN RADIO" and the hearing they're covering. I listen to NPR for most news, and even it tends to gravitate to the liberal base that supports NPR, myself included btw. It's a good balance to Rush. But NPR is way better than CNN or any other TV media with the possible exception of News Hour w/ Lehr.

But "common news" I don't get. I probably get as mad as you do watching it. I'll sit covering a hearing, and then see that same hearing covered on TV and I wouldn't recognize it. Again, I'm sitting there for a different reason, but I'm not deaf, blind and stupid. I think there is a huge opportunity for competition here.

And anyone thinking of running for office out there -- your press secretary is your most important selection.
M
on Nov 17, 2007
15. When a demonstration forms in a third world country, shouting "Death to Americans", perhaps it is not that spontaneous? Perhaps it is because the cameras are rolling? Perhaps that needs reported? Perhaps the entire demonstration is STAGED!?


They often are. If ever you hear about a demonstration in Indonesia, the first assumption is that it's staged. Thousands of people make a good living out of being professional demonstrators.
on Nov 17, 2007
Yup, that's my point. And have you ever, ever, ever seen a news report on that???? No. Number 22. Report to me when people's emotions must be bought and paid for before they will take to the streets.
on Nov 17, 2007
And anyone thinking of running for office out there -- your press secretary is your most important selection.
M


for those who can afford one...lol!
on Nov 18, 2007
Ahhhhh. You see, that's where the soft money comes in! Three sides of the pyramid. These things were written thousands of years ago. But, be wise my friend, only the journey is written, not the end.

Convenient.

(The Mummy II)
on Nov 18, 2007
I had pancakes yesterday. Jesus lives in me!
on Nov 20, 2007
Agreed with some, disagreed with others, glad to hear all of them from you!

11. Trying to resond to criticism about not covering enough feel good Iraq stories is stupid. When a situation is crap, report that. Show us.


I would agree, but add, "We don't need 'feel good' stories, but when our troops do well, or a city has power that never had it before... that's not 'feel good' that is examples of success!

Also

Why is good news from the war "propaganda", but everything the enemy leaders put on video or audio tape is "news"?

If you hear that over 100 people were murdered in the Superdome, but you didn't actually see any bodies... it probably didn't happen...

If it did happen, the bodies are kept in the freezers down stairs, get off your butt and look in the freezers before sensationalizing what you know is a lie.

What good to politicians do in a disaster area... if they don't drop everything to get there, that's probably a good thing.

If we read the facts of the story before you print a "correction" to your original report, you failed at your job.

If all it is is a photo op, tell us. Maybe then photo ops will be replaced by photo coverage of actual events.

When you are doing your "on the scene" live report, all those disaster recovery, EMS, fire and other emergency workers hear you, and know you are lying through your teeth... and we tell everyone about it later.

and my personal favorite...

I don't care if you are "the press", your Constitutional Right to cover the story of the flood does not exempt you from the laws of physics. The Snake River doesn't care about your Constitutional Right to get the perfect shot of the flood, it will sweep your van away just like anyone else's. (ask me about that funny story sometime). ;~D
on Nov 20, 2007
I don't care if you are "the press", your Constitutional Right to cover the story of the flood does not exempt you from the laws of physics. The Snake River doesn't care about your Constitutional Right to get the perfect shot of the flood, it will sweep your van away just like anyone else's. (ask me about that funny story sometime). ;~D


OK, THAT GETS TO BE (what are we up to??? NUMBER 22. I immediately thought of Anderson Cooper covering some hurricane (cat 1) back a few years ago. What a dork. Even now, years later, I thik what a dork.
on Nov 20, 2007

What good to politicians do in a disaster area... if they don't drop everything to get there, that's probably a good thing.

Thankfully, I can tell you, the press shares this opinion. My colleagues report the idiots visiting the disaster zone, but are groaning the entire time they do it.

Usually, because it extends a story (and remaining in some pit hole) by a few days when the story would otherwise end.

(Notice when I'm not pissed they are my colleagues and when I am pissed I distance myself from the press as far as possible.)
on Nov 20, 2007
Thankfully, I can tell you, the press shares this opinion. My colleagues report the idiots visiting the disaster zone, but are groaning the entire time they do it.


Probably so, but let that politician sit out a disaster (or show up a day or two after the fact) and your collegues will do 5 days, wall to wall coverage of it. ;~D
2 Pages1 2